beta
Text
1. The Defendants each of KRW 20,000,000 to the Plaintiff, respectively, and 5% per annum from April 3, 2014 to January 22, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant B, while working as the president of the Plaintiff Union from March 4, 2010 to March 16, 2011, had overall control over the place of business from March 4, 2010, confirmed the inventory of the three-fourth quarter of the Plaintiff Union with the head of the Plaintiff Union and the standing director of the Plaintiff Union, and discussed the disposal plan, presented the plan for mixing the rice of 2009, which was not sold until December 2010 with the Defendant C, the head of the D Processing Team of the Plaintiff Union, and the standing director of the Plaintiff Union, and sold the rice of 2009, which was falsely labeled in 2010, and sold the rice of 14,164,150,50,500, while discussing the disposal plan.
B. Moreover, from March 17, 2011 to around October 2012, G, a general manager of the Plaintiff’s headquarters while working as the complaint of the Plaintiff Union, verified the inventory of the three-fourth quarter of the Plaintiff Union to E and F, around October 2012, and discussed the disposal plan after suggesting the method of mixing the rice of 2011, which is not sold until December 2012, 201, with the consent of E,F and Defendant C, together with the rice of 2011, which was mixed into the rice of 2012 and sold a total amount of KRW 3,63,434,610,610, which was falsely labeled as 2012 by mixing it with the rice of 2012.
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant mixed arrangement” by referring to each of the above mixed arrangement.
After the existence of the instant mixture, the Plaintiff’s association returned rice equivalent to KRW 412,146,40,00 among the rice products of this case, including the rice products subject to the instant mixture. The amounting to KRW 118,323,470 out of the tin, which was returned to the tin and supplied at the e-mail sales outlet, was sold at a discount of KRW 78,323,470, and the Plaintiff, i.e., the Plaintiff, while not selling tin, did not sell tin, paid KRW 65,937,68 with labor costs and general expenses, and KRW 10,921,100 for the transportation expenses following the said return.
In addition, for the period of November 2013 and December 2, 2013, the rice sales of the Plaintiff Union from 2010.