Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, on May 27, 2011, sentenced the Gwangju District Court to one year, for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on August 24, 2011.
[Criminal facts] The defendant is the actual representative of D and E in the Dong-gu, Gwangju, the North-gu, and the second class of the dispute resolution committee.
Defendant stated in the above E that “A victim H would refund training fees if he/she receives a training course for environmental pollution prevention guidance.”
However, it is well known that E’s training courses for preventing environmental pollution are not subject to the refund of training fees if a training institution entrusted by a business owner due to the workplace skill development training course receives training expenses from a business owner and bears training expenses, and if a trainee bears training expenses, he/she is not subject to the refund of training fees, and the defendant is well aware of such circumstances, and H is not entitled to refund training fees.
Nevertheless, the Defendant was issued KRW 60,00,000 in total over 28 times from around March 8, 2014 to around December 11, 2014, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Form in the same manner, including that the Defendant received KRW 660,00 from the injured party as a training fee for around March 8, 2014.
"2015 Highest 3268"
1. The criminal defendant against the Ministry of Labor employing victims is a person who is between I (a disposition of suspending prosecution) and his/her husband and wife, and J, K, and L is an employer operating each child care center, and M, N,O, P, Q, R, and R are infant care teachers employed by each child care center (J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, and R, each of which is suspended prosecution). The defendant, along with I, operates documents as if Q completed the training course even if he/she did not complete the training course.