Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

If A fails to pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person working as the managing director and the head of human resource development training center of a corporation B. Defendant B was a corporation established for the purpose of fish and electric axis manufacturing, sales business, etc., and on July 1, 2012, the Korea Manpower Agency was selected as an agency for the development of national human resources development.

1. Where Defendant A’s violation of the Act on Fraud and Subsidy Management was the director of human resource development training in the company B, and the said company was selected as a consultative operating institution for the development of national human resources of the Korea Manpower Agency, he/she shall provide employees with education and training programs for improvement of job ability and job ability improvement training for partner employees in accordance with the implementation plan and methods reported to the Korea Manpower Agency for Human Resources Development, and claim training expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant filed a false claim for education and training expenses through the employment Ministry of Labor, even though there was no training course conducted from Ulsan-gun E and B around June 27, 2013 to February 21, 2013, and from February 20, 2013 to February 21, 2013.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the Minister of Labor with employment of victims, received 3,188,100 won through the Agricultural Cooperatives Deposit Account (F) in the name of the Agricultural Cooperative Co., Ltd. on July 2, 2013 from the Ministry of Labor as a training fee for education and training, and received subsidies through a false application.

In addition, the Defendant received 189,330,780 won in total over 44 times from that time until June 7, 2015 in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached Form, and received subsidies through a false application.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Subsidy Management, etc. by Defendant B was granted subsidies by filing a false application with the Defendant, who is an employee of the Defendant, at the date and place of Paragraph 1.