logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.09 2012고정1943
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2011, the defendant was the fraud of Han-man C of the People's Republic of China's nationality, and around May 13, 201, the expiration date of the visa period of C, but it seems difficult to extend the visa period. The defendant, while introducing C to D who is a citizen of the Republic of Korea, paid KRW 5 million, and D and C promised to file a false marriage report for the extension of the visa period.

1. On August 1, 201, the public service center of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the registry, the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the registry

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D and C, made a false report to the public official to record false facts in the electronic records information system of the same electronic records as the authentic copy of the authentic deed.

2. An event D such as a false entry electronic record, C had a public official in charge of family register who is unable to identify the above name at a time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1 store and operate a family register electronic data processing system, which is a public electronic record stating the aforementioned false facts.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D and C, exercised false official electronic records.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Testimony of witness G;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of C and H:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 228 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of entry of false information in public electronic records), Articles 229 and 228 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising false information in public electronic records) and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow