1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part relating to the Plaintiff’s appeal is the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “new stocks (E)” of No. 15 of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, was changed to L by reason of a change in the progress due to a failure to enter the vehicle as of the date of closing argument, and hereinafter “new stocks for accident”).

Part 3 of the 11th judgment of the first instance court, "Paves were cut off by Paves and Faves" was applied to "the single line was occurred from Paves inside the Paves and Gaves."

After the document No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "No. 20" is added to the "No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and the "the result of the inquiry about M" is added.

The fifth sentence of the first instance judgment " was installed at around April 2007," in the fifth sentence of the fifth sentence, "the diskettes was installed at around August 19, 195, the first transmission date."

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 5, 20 to 9, 5, 20, 5, 20, 6, 6, 9, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,

The following circumstances are acknowledged in full view of the facts acknowledged as above, the results of the appraisal by the appraiser M in the first instance trial, the results of the fact inquiry about M, and the purport of the entire pleadings. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that the previous accident occurred on December 27, 2015 was caused by the defendant's negligence in management

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the power failure.

In the management area of the defendant, who is the power supplier, the diskettes which caused the power failure accident, is located in the area of management, and the defendant has been regularly checking and managing the new stocks of the accident and the surrounding tracks.

The contact volume of the ticket managers and the unstable characteristics of business were caused by the high-quality breakdown, and due to this reason, the defendant from around 1996.