Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person other than a pharmacy founder shall sell or acquire drugs for the purpose of sale.
The Defendant heard the novel that it is helpful for the ice system, such as Primomomoban (frist column) to use the ice system through the Internet, etc. while purchasing the ice system through the Internet and taking the ice system, the Defendant intended to sell the ice system through the Internet car page, etc., using the fact that mass purchase of the ice system can be allowed.
Despite the fact that the Defendant was not a pharmacy founder, around June 3, 2016, at his own residence in Gangnam-gu Seoul and 101, the Defendant sold medicines of KRW 74,63,100 in total at 372 times in the market price, including selling medicines of KRW 74,63,100 in the same way from June 3, 2015 to September 2, 2016, by reporting the advertisement of “D”, a special drug, purchased from C, and requesting purchase of “D” to E, who received KRW 345,00,000.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution;
1. Certificate of seizure (Evidence No. 8), protocol of seizure (No. 9 times a year), and list of seizure (No. 15 times a year);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to attach a suspect A, the background of self-denunciation and a father of a suspect store);
1. Article 93 (1) 7 and Article 44 (1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (or selection of imprisonment with prison labor), inclusive, with respect to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation is the defendant who is the primary offender, and the investigation agency himself/herself was unable to commit the crime, and all the facts constituting the crime have been led to confession from the investigation agency to the court, and a mistake has been divided shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the above facts.