logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.01.22 2015나24951
약정금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the cited party members of the judgment of the court of first instance explain this case are the same as the entry in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following additional determinations, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The defendant asserts that the preparation of the written statement of this case was forced by the defendant who is the weak in order to mislead the union and the executives of the union, and is null and void as a juristic act of anti-social order. Thus, the plaintiff cannot respond to the claim of this case.

Only with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 5, it is insufficient to recognize that the preparation of each letter of this case constitutes a juristic act contrary to social order, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it (the same shall apply as above, if a disposition was taken to the effect that all the complaints, etc. against the officers of the defendant's association was made). The defendant's above assertion is without merit without any need to examine it.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow