1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why the cited party of the judgment of the court of first instance states concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following additional determinations, and thus, it is determined to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

In addition, even if the evidence submitted or invoked by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial showed each of the statements in Gap evidence No. 20 through 25 submitted by the Plaintiff at the trial, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit, based on the premise that the Plaintiff’s performance falls short of quality standards under the supply contract of this case under the supply contract of this case, whether the Defendant’s actual agent supplied to the Plaintiff falls short of the quality of the sample of Dongdo Electric Complex that was supplied to the Plaintiff by the Defendant (whether the quality of the sample of Dongdo Electric Complex supplied to the Plaintiff by the Defendant), and there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge whether Dongdo Electric Complex supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff is not a Do Electric Complex or its Do Electric Complex is extinguished in the process of chromothing, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is with merit, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.