A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant departing from the Republic of Korea to the Republic of the Philippines around November 2006, and running the Home Testing in the name of “C” in detail from March 2007 to around March 2007.

From November 2007, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the victim was a used car export business through the victim D's children living in the home park run by himself from November 2007.

1. Around the end of December 2007, the Defendant, who committed the crime of January 5, 2008, sent a phone to the victim from the site of the Philippines (hereinafter referred to as “the President”) around the end of December, 2007, and then imported as much as he had his own largest exports.

The lower is the motor vehicle with two parts of the motor vehicle company, which is in charge of the sale of Korea and Japan.

In this time, it is believed that the passenger car is a good condition and has a lot of straw, so that half of the amount of the car will be transferred to the down payment first, and if the car arrives in Korea, the remainder will be sent.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives down payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above used benz car.

Therefore, the Defendant was transferred from the injured party to the Cit Bank account (Account Number:F) in the name of E, which he/she manages as the down payment on January 5, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 8, 2008, the Defendant, on the charge of the crime of January 8, 2008, 2008, walked a telephone again to the victim on the influencies (hereinafter referred to as the “FI”), and “FI will load one vehicle on one vehicle, but the price is similar.”

Since there is one set of BMW car from a good condition, it is necessary to purchase it as in the middle and high benz car already contracted.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to send the victim with the above-mentioned BMW car.

Thus, the defendant is suffering from the victim.