logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.20 2018고단4832
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On August 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the official prison on March 2, 2018.

1. On June 17, 2018, the Defendant issued an order to the victim C with the victim C on the 19:00 Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2018, to the effect that it would normally pay the completion of the set, and that the victim would be able to pay the completion of the set, and that the Defendant would be able to request the victim to perform the set-day procedure.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even after the four-day procedures are conducted.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received four-day procedures equivalent to KRW 200,000 from the injured party; and (c) did not pay the price; and (d) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

2. "2018 Highest 4917".

A. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 06:45, on the road of “F” located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si; (b) on the road, even if using a taxi, the Defendant was aware that he would normally pay the taxi fee despite having no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee; (c) took a victim’s H taxi in the light of the fact that he would normally pay the taxi fee; and (d) had the victim operate the said taxi up to the road prior to the “J” located in Seosung-si I on the same day; and (d) did not have the victim pay an amount equivalent to KRW 13,500 to the said taxi fee.

B. On June 23, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “M clothes store operated by the Victim L in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si (K), while displaying the Defendant’s mobile screen as if the goods were normally purchased, and that “the payment was completed by transferring the price to the account” was completed by transferring it to the account.

However, in fact, the above cell phone screen on the screen before completing the transfer of account was not paid, and the defendant was given clothes, etc. from the injured party.

arrow