logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 09. 28. 선고 2017누52285 판결
보충적 평가방법에 의한 주식가액을 근거로 저가양도에 해당한다고 본 처분은 적법[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2016-Gu Partnership-53142 (Law No. 18, 2017)

Title

The disposition that constitutes a low-price transfer on the basis of the value of stocks by supplementary evaluation methods is legitimate.

Summary

(1) The instant disposition that deemed that the transfer of shares constitutes a transfer at a low price between specially related persons based on the value of shares calculated pursuant to Article 56(1)1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act is lawful.

Related statutes

Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (Article 35(1)1 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act) shall give rise to gains from transfer or transfer.

Cases

2017Nu5285 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

a) the Director of the Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

August 31, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

September 28, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance court shall be revoked. The imposition of the gift tax on October 8, 2012, which the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on July 9, 2014, by the △△△△△△△△△△△△, which was made on October 8,

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of a part of the following, and thus, it refers to the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

Parts to be removed or added.

In Section 5, Section 2, ", at the time of the 2007 and 2008 above, the stock transaction value of this case at the time of the 2007 and 2008 was below the value calculated on the basis of 5,000 won per share, which is the face value of the shares of this case."

○, on the 8th page, "1.4 billion won" is raised to "1.4 billion won".

○, on the 8th page, "18 billion won" is raised to "100 million won".

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.

arrow