All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. According to the appraisal results of the game machine of this case as a factual misunderstanding, the internal design program deliberated by the Committee on Water Management of the original game and the internal design program at the time of the control of this case are identical.

Therefore, a seizure game machine has been altered.

It is difficult to see it.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in the instant case by comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented in its holding.

In light of the following circumstances, i.e., ① the credit-spin game of this case at the time of the determination of classifying the rating of the Committee on Water Management of the game and the game of NAVER’s “NV”, the following circumstances revealed to the court below, i.e., ① the credit-spin game of this case at the time of the determination of classifying the rating of the Committee on Water Management of the game, and the game of NAVER’s “NV”, and the statement to the effect that the manual of each of the above games does not have any function (No. 1, No. 209, 251 of the evidence record No. 209, Dec. 29, 2007). ② Nevertheless, each of the above games has a different function (Evidence No. 2, No. 604,617 of the evidence record No. 2, No. 604, Nov. 29, 200).

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion of factual mistake can be accepted.