logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단818
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with a hurburged vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On April 30, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license at around 08:20 on April 30, 2015, operated the said car, and led the car to turn to the left at about 30 km a speed from the direction of the Jeju National University at Hando University at Hando University at about 114.

At the same time, there is a situation in which a vehicle under signal was stopped in order to turn to the left from the direction of the Jeju mail concentration station to the direction of the subordinate apartment, and thus, there was a duty of care to prevent a person engaged in driving service from harming the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left, and caused the victim D(the age of 57) who was waiting to turn to the left part of the above vehicle due to the negligence near the above center line, and was driven by the victim D(the age of 57).

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to its shock, suffered a scarcity, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the above-learning passenger car so that 416,480 won, such as the exchange of the preceding panion, etc., and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim by stopping immediately.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a motor vehicle with detacheds as stated in Paragraph 1, which was owned by the Defendant and was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place of Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report and a traffic accident actual condition investigation report;

1. On-site map, etc. and on-site photograph of a traffic accident;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. Written estimate;

arrow