A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) conducted a alcohol alcohol test within the Seo-gu Bcheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) conducted a alcohol alcohol test by voluntarily driving and measuring a blood alcohol accident according to the said district; and (c) was notified to the police officers belonging to the police patrol unit of the said police station at 0.142%; and (d) took a bath to the police officers located within the said district, such as “fluoring bit of a bitch, fluoring, breathing, and Chewing,” and assaulted the said D, i.e., the son’s shoulder and drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of drinking traffic accidents.

2. The Defendant damaged the public object by inserting the cell phone (E) which was arrested in flagrant offenders under suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties such as the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph at the time and place, and laid down the cell phone on the floor, which is a public object on the table, thereby damaging the repair cost of approximately 30,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. F's self-written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and estimates on damage;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that a confession is made while committing a crime, the fact that there is no same criminal record for the latest twenty years, and the fact that a written agreement has been submitted for the crime of damaging public

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;