1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The facts of recognition and the reasons why the court states this part of the parties' assertion are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination

A. According to the appraisal report of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation, submitted with Gap evidence No. 11 at the point of combustion of the instant fire accident, the following facts are acknowledged: (i) cosmetic part was partially burned; (ii) the roof and the ceiling part was burned out compared to the surrounding area; (iii) the surface and the bottom part of the multi-use part was burned out; (iv) the shape of the burning out from the inside side of the main room was confirmed as the inner combustion of the inner combustion; (iv) the tring at the main room located in the main room where the shape of the combustion expanded is visible; and (iii) three tampers have been discovered at the main outlet where the electric source code of the electricity, electricity, and air conditioning system was displayed; and (v) the electrical melting in the main outlet part was identified; and (v) the external air conditioning is not identified in the external air conditioning, and the external air conditioning is not identified.

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts, the fire occurred due to electrical heat on the three main contact lines of the main part, and the fire was expanded to the part of the cosmetics shop and the part of the multi-use room through the ceiling and roof consisting of the trop sande position panel, which was moved to the garbing side wall of the three main contact lines.

Unless it is seen as above, the fact that cosmetics are seriously burned in the direction of the main part of the ceiling and the wall surface of the multi-use room is not burned, while the inside side of the main part is not easy to explain.

On the other hand, the witness of the first instance court belongs to the Seoul Eastern Fire Station.