logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.09 2016가단533431
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant: 5% per annum from September 12, 2016 to August 9, 2017 with respect to each of the said KRW 28,00,000 to the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Defendant was a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing its head office on the 76-ro, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, the Defendant was a company affiliated with the Defendant, and the network D was a worker affiliated with the Defendant. 2) On September 12, 2016, Hanpo Food E factory around 19:30, using the “Broro-type plastic machine” in the “Bro-type plastic machine” in Hanpo Food E factory around 19:30.

3) With a rise in the shape of a machine manufacturing plastic container, one gold-type (Agold-type) has melted the heat, melting the air into the heat, and extract one product by heating the air, and melting the other gold-type (B gold-type) again during the air cooling of the gold-type A, and melting the air, and inserting it into the air, and inserting it into the air, so as to make it impossible for people to enter the same sex instrument. However, BrD has been manufactured to automatically stop the operation of the sex instrument on the face of the above sex instrument. 4) The wind-type D added tape to the plastic interlocking sub-branch so that the head is not operated properly, and it has been put into the sex-type system without stopping the operation of the above sex instrument in the condition that the head is not operated.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident". 5) The plaintiffs are children of the network D. [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap 1 through 8 (including virtual numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

B. A business owner who is liable for damages is obligated to take account of the safety of workers, such as taking necessary measures so that workers do not suffer damage to the fulfillment of their obligations.

In this case, the defendant confirms in advance necessary matters, such as placement, education, work methods, protective devices, etc. of workers, if any danger exists in mechanical driving operations.

arrow