All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the facts charged of assault against the victim F (hereinafter “victim”) of the misunderstanding of facts (misunderstanding of facts and Sentencing) by the Defendant (hereinafter “victim”), the Defendant merely took a bath by the victim student without participating in his/her behavior that the victim student intends to go against his/her face, and did not take the breath of the victim student’s breath, and did not take the breath of the victim student’s breath, and did not take the breast of the victim student.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below convicting this part of the facts charged is erroneous, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실 오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 피해학생은 수사기관에서부터 당 심에 이르기까지 ‘ 체육수업 중 피구 공을 들어 피고인에게 던지는 시늉을 했는데, 피고인이 바로 “ 씨 발. 개새끼야. ”라고 말하며 다가와서 한 손으로 목을 잡고 발을 걸어 바닥에 넘어뜨리고 목을 누르면서 제 뺨을 다른 한 손으로 몇 번 때렸다( 아픈 느낌이 있었지만 뺨을 세게 때린 것은 아니다)’ 는 취지로 진술하였는데( 증거기록 33, 34 면, 68, 106 면, 공판기록 97~101 면), 그 진술이 일관되고 이 사건 당시의 상황과 범행의 주요 부분에 대하여 자세하게 기억하고 있는 점, ② 피해학생이 피고인으로부터 뺨을 3~4 회 정도 맞았다고

However, it is difficult to clearly distinguish the number of times of statements from the defendant, because the victim victim takes her scam from the defendant at the time of her scam, which is beyond the method corresponding to the scam from the defendant, as the scam of the victim victim, as the scam of the scam of the scam.