logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.03 2016고단152
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who drives C 125cc mera owned by B.

On September 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without a driver’s license while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.15% during blood transfusion 17:15% on September 13, 2015, and led the front side of the “E” located in Gangwon-gun D, the Defendant driven the said vehicle from the front side of the mouth.

At the same time, he was a two-way road and a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to drive safely while emphasizing the bank.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not find out that the victim F(29 tax) was driving at the right edge of the horse prior to the right edge, and did not drive the GM5 car in the signal atmosphere, and did not find out that the Defendant was driving at the right edge of the horse prior to the right edge, and did not shock the front part of the damaged vehicle, which followed the right edge of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such negligence, sustained injury to the Victim F, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of two weeks’ medical treatment, and the victim H (the age 25 years), such as dynasium and tension in the bones of wood, which requires two weeks’ medical treatment.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) was driven by the Defendant, from the street in front of the rest area of bals in front of the Sinwon Jin-gun, Gangwon-do, North Korea-do, which is located on behalf of the Defendant for the use of the fals in front of the rest area of 1.5 km from the street in front of the “E” in D, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.15 % in heat, he driven the Calsab owned by B.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a C-wheeled Driving Vehicle without a driver’s license for the same section at the same time and time as paragraph (2).

4. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, due to the negligence as set forth in paragraph (1), destroyed the damaged vehicle’s repair cost amounting to approximately KRW 573,284.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A survey report on actual condition (1), (2), and on-site photographs;

1. A driver who makes an inquiry about the result of crackdown on driving under drinking and driving under the influence of alcohol;

arrow