logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.06.23 2016고단73
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2016, around 02:10, the Defendant: (a) boarded the F taxi driven by E in front of the singing practice place located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) did not talk about an accurate destination; and (c) did not leave the taxi at a taxi; and (d) went to the G belt of the Incheon Police Station located in the same Dong by the said E.

At around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendant received a taxi fee of the above E while the police officers at the same place verified the situation of the case.

A statement was made and returned to the G District, and that was returned to the G District, and that was returned to the G District before the G District entrance.

We have no reason to do with the G G G G G G G G Haz's "Wooh", and "Woohhh tin tin"

C. The Defendant 1 expressed his desire to “Eule” and the head of the instant H was the head, and the other police officers prevented him from doing so, but the said H’s head was the head, and the said H’s head was the head again again, and the police officer’s head was again requested to verify his personal information from the said H within the G District, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the case and the prevention of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and E;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case, report on inspection, and investigation report (Attachment to the video of this case);

1. Application of statutes governing field video CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the mental and physical weakness of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order should be mitigated on the grounds that the defendant was in a mental and physical weak condition due to depression and the recovery from water exemption at the time of committing the crime in this case.

The circumstances and methods of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the E’s statement contents, and the Defendant’s seal, recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.

arrow