1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from June 22, 2017 to May 29, 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 15, 2012, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the pre-delivery 1, 200,000 won (i.e., KRW 60,000 x KRW 360 per 1 US) x issued a tax invoice on January 12, 2013 with the supply value of KRW 21,60,000. (ii) The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the pre-delivery 10,000 won (i.e., KRW 100,000 x KRW 300 per 1 US) and issued the tax invoice on January 8, 2014 with the supply value of KRW 30,000.

3) On November 26, 2014, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 30 million to the Defendant (i.e., KRW 100,000 x KRW 300 per annum); KRW 15,00 on December 4, 201 of the same year (i.e., KRW 50,000 x KRW 300 per annum); and (ii) on December 11, 19 of the same year (i.e., KRW 60,000 x KRW 300 per annum 630,000; and (iii) on January 8, 2015, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 306,00,000,000 for each of the 3060,000 won for each of the 201,000,000 won for each of the 361,000,000 won for each of the 201,000 won for each of the 20.

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the remaining amount of KRW 10 million (=10 million = KRW 114.6 million (= KRW 30 million) - KRW 14.6 million) and damages for delay.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that he additionally supplied the Defendant with the 16 million won per February 15, 2015 (i.e., the 50 million won (i.e., the 50 million won x the 320 won per one U.S.) x the 320 won i.e., the Plaintiff’s assertion, and the evidence consistent with the Plaintiff’s assertion is written as evidence and as witness C.