beta
Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 40,000,000 won and the period from June 11, 2014 to October 17, 2016.
Reasons
1. Article 1(D) of the facts of recognition shall be sold under an agreement under the following provisions, and the defendant C shall purchase it.
Article 2 Sales Price shall be 300 won per annum (600,000 U.S., 180,000 won) and Defendant C shall pay D the price in the following manner:
1.The down payment of KRW 50 million shall be deposited in D at the same time as this contract is concluded.
2. An intermediate payment of KRW 130 million shall be deposited into the passbook by June 10, 2014.
In the absence of dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 3-1 of the evidence No. 3, the Plaintiff using the trade name D, upon the request of the Defendants for the supply of the uniforms, supplied Defendant B fishery partnership corporation with the 600,000 Ma Ri (hereinafter “instant uniforms”) around November 2013, and on December 12, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a sales contract for the uniforms (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) containing the following matters with Defendant C with regard to the supply of the uniforms of this case.
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 40 million after deducting the amount of KRW 140 million from the person who had already received payment from the Plaintiff at KRW 180,000,000 from the supply price of the previous uniforms of this case.
3. Judgment on the defendants' assertion
A. As to this, the Defendants agreed to reduce the amount of KRW 30 million out of the total amount of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment because the size of the pre-payment of the pre-payment supplied by the Plaintiff at the time is small and not good. Thus, the Defendants asserted that the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of
B. We examine the following: (a) the aforementioned evidence; and (b) the evidence Nos. 2-1 and 3-2 of the evidence Nos. 2-2; (c) the witness E and F’s testimony or partial testimony; and (d) the inquiry and reply to the Korea Electric Power Corporation of this Court (as of May 12, 2017).