The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of this case is as follows: (a) the Defendant, whose audit duty has been suspended, posted false information, thereby obstructing the collection of E’s management fee; and (b) the victim E, the chief executive officer, at the second meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting of the above Code,

2. Before the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor ex officio, the prosecutor applied for changes in the indictment with respect to the defendant at the trial court for changes in the indictment as follows. Since the subject of the judgment was changed by this court's permission, the judgment of the court below is no longer maintained.

However, even if there are such reasons for ex officio reversal, the prosecutor's assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles is still subject to the judgment of this court within the scope related to the modified facts.

【Revised charge】 The Defendant is the non-Dong-dong owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel.

On June 8, 2010, the Defendant is operating the management office by entrusting the management experience to E, who is not in charge of management experience, with the management office guidance in accordance with the legal measures of the C-dong occupant and user level, D (former Management Office) and the head of the management office.

(b) March 2010.