The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is a sectional owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel B’s consent.

On June 8, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around the first floor of the instant officetel B, the title “A-dong occupant and user level, the management office and the head of the management office in accordance with the legal measures of the former Management Office (former),” which read “A-dong occupant of the C-dong, and the head of the management office and the head of the management office in accordance with the legal measures of the former Management Office.” The details of management fees notified in March and April 2010 are also unclear and the evidentiary documents are concealed. (b) The payment deferment of management fees was deferred until the opening of the separate bank under the name of the occupants until the time of the opening of the bank under the name of the occupants, and distribution was made to the occupants only after the lapse of the period.”

However, on March 18, 2010, E was appointed as the head of the above Office of Office of Office of Office Management in accordance with a legitimate resolution at the second meeting of the above Office of Office Operating Committee (hereinafter “the instant Committee”), and there was no problem in the management expenses notified to occupants in March and April 2010, or there was no evidence reduction in the content thereof. Rather, on the ground that the Defendant violated the management rules as the auditor of the instant Committee, the instant Committee passed a resolution to suspend the Defendant’s duties as the auditor at the third meeting on May 6, 2010 (hereinafter “the instant resolution”), and the same year.

5. 10. Since the Defendant notified the instant resolution to the Defendant, the Defendant was in the status of suspending his duties as an auditor.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as if the Defendant continued to perform his duties as an auditor, distributed the leaflets containing such false facts to occupants and reserved the payment of management expenses, thereby hindering the management of the instant officetels, such as the collection of management expenses of the victim E, the head of the management office, by deceptive means.

(b).