A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:42 on August 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stated that he was assaulted by the Defendant; (b) stated that he was able to do so several times from the Sinung Police Station affiliated with the Sinung Police Station that he was dispatched to the scene after having received 112 report; and (c) stated that he would not have to use her face and work for the reporter; (d) she would have to write her face. We now write her door. We will she will write her door. I will do not she will do so. I will she will do so only she will do so; (b) she would have come to go back to the police box at around 03:25 on the same day; (c) she would have been able to write her face to her face; (d) she would have to write her face to her front her face and her face to her front her face; and (d) she would have to go back to the police box.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site closure photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (camp image analysis);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution;