logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.16 2017고단2926
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 5. 27. 01:37 경 부산 부산진구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 식당에서 술에 취해 잠을 자고 있던 중, 술에 취한 손님이 일어나지 않는다는 위 식당 종업원의 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 부산진 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 경사 E, 순경 F이 피고인을 깨워 귀가할 것을 권유하자, 경찰관들에게 ‘ 와, 내가 뭘 잘못했나,

Miscellaneously, I am her bath, she would like to read “I Hashee, Hashee, Mashee.,” while calculating, I am her bath to Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Ha?” While the police officers continued to have her home home out of the restaurant, she her "I am Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Hashee Ha", and her face was her face when the police officers continued to her home in the back seat of the slope E, and the police officers recommended the Defendant to her home from the patrol and again her home in the direction of the Eth 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, G, and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was committed by the Defendant on August 26, 2013, even though the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won due to interference with the performance of official duties on August 26, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the police officer to interfere with the performance of official duties and thereby interfere with the performance of official

However, the fact that the defendant is against the law, the social relationship is clear, and other matters.

arrow