logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.05.30 2018가단94204
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in Annex A’s Schedule 1;

B. Defendant B shall set out in attached list No. 2.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A, a lessee, with the amount of KRW 15,867,00, monthly rent of KRW 205,780 from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018, with respect to the real estate stated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 on December 27, 2016, which was the lessee, with the lease deposit of KRW 15,867,00, monthly rent of KRW 205,780, and the Defendant A was in arrears with the lease of at least three vehicles. (2) The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the lessee from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2019, with the lease term of the real estate stated in the attached Table No. 2 of the attached Table No. 2 as the lessee and the lessee from September 27, 2017 to September 30, 2019.

3) On September 22, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the deceased F, the lessee, and the real estate listed in the [Attachment List No. 3] from September 22, 2016 to October 31, 2018, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 34,141,00, monthly rent of KRW 251,760, and the networkF delayed payment of at least three vehicles. The deceased on July 14, 2018, and Defendant C, D, and E succeeded to the networkF. 4) The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit with the Defendants on November 27, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant A: The remaining Defendants deemed as confessions under Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act: The absence of dispute, each of the statements (including serial numbers) in subparagraphs 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, each of the above lease agreements was terminated upon the plaintiff's notice of termination of the lease agreement on the grounds of the delinquency in rent between the defendant A, B, and the networkF.

Therefore, Defendant A is obligated to hand over the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, Defendant B is obligated to hand over the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and Defendant C, D, and E, the net F’s heir, respectively.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and it is ordered to accept it.

arrow