(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.05.30 2018가단93003

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.05.30 2018가단93003

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in Annex A’s Schedule 1;

B. Defendant C shall be listed in [Attachment] Section 2.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A, the lessee, with the amount of KRW 34,051,00, monthly rent of KRW 236,620, with regard to the real estate stated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, from October 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019, with the lease deposit of KRW 34,051,00, monthly rent of KRW 236,620, and Defendant A was in arrears with the lease of at least three years. (2) The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant C, the lessee, from September 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018, with the lease term of the real estate stated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table, from August 31, 2016 to August 31, 2018, with the lease deposit of KRW 110,145,000, monthly rent of KRW 524,500.

3) On February 14, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant D, the lessee, at the lease term from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2020, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 25,394,00, monthly rent of KRW 212,380. Defendant D delayed with the lease period of at least three vehicles. (4) The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant E, the lessee, from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 21,354,00, monthly rent of KRW 167,370, and Defendant E, the Plaintiff delayed with the lease period of at least three vehicles.

5) The Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the termination of each of the above lease agreements on the grounds of a long-term unpaid payment, and filed the instant lawsuit on November 12, 2018. [Defendant C, D, and E, based on the basis of recognition: Defendant A: Defendant A, based on Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act, has no dispute, and the purport of the entire pleadings is as follows: (a) the evidence No. 1-3, A-2-3, and A-3; and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, each of the above lease agreements was terminated upon the notification of termination of the lease agreement by the Plaintiff on the grounds of the Defendants’ respective delinquency in rent.

Therefore, the Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant C, real estate listed in attached Table No. 2, as well as real estate listed in attached Table No. 1.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제150조

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2019.05.30 2018가단94204

-서울동부지방법원 2017.01.13 2016가단124376

-서울서부지방법원 2020.05.22 2019가단14182

-수원지방법원평택지원 2020.10.13 2019가단8264

-서울서부지방법원 2020.01.10 2019가단244143