beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine years.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the facts charged are not guilty.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From January 2006 to July 2009, the Defendant is a person engaged in the management of various funds, such as field transfer money, etc., at the construction site located in Seongbuk-gu, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, where the victim performed, from July 2009 to April 2013, and from May 2013 to January 201, the Defendant is a person who works as an assistant to the management of various field funds, such as field transfer money.
1. The Defendant committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) with intent to consume the amount owned by the victim deposited in the said financial account for personal use by advertising that the Defendant manages the financial account in which field transfer money, etc. is deposited while in charge of the above H construction site management assistance work.
On July 30, 2009, the Defendant voluntarily withdrawn KRW 120,000,000 from the company bank account in the name of the victim, which was deposited in the bank account in the above bank account, at the above H bank site office around July 30, 2009, and arbitrarily remitted the money to the bank account in the name of the Defendant, and consumed it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc. at that time.
1. As indicated in the statement, the sum totaling KRW 833,500,000 owned by the victim was consumed nine times from around that time to June 28, 2013 in mind.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.
2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) is working as a management assistance employee in the F Construction Site Act and H Construction Site. The lease deposit for the on-site employees is only reflected in the director general of the accounting division of the construction site only in the “unrefied claim” but the on-site employees do not pay any attention thereto, and the victim’s head office also applies for settlement of accounts at the construction site.