logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.04.26 2017고단322
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and by a fine of one hundred and fifty hundred thousand won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) went to a person who terminated the shortage of household living expenses; (b) went from around October 2015 to a victim (State) who retired from the said household materials warehouse; (c) stolen the “dubitls” by cutting down the cresh of weekends into the materials warehouse of the victim (State)C; and (d) was willing to gain profits from selling on the water on the water.

A. On May 28, 2016, at night, the Defendant: (a) committed theft of structures at night around May 28, 2016, when 200, when the Defendant was operated by D victim at Silung-si on May 28, 2016; (b) went into the factory through a window behind the factory without a lock-base; and (c) intrudes into the factory; (d) 4.247,00 won in total at the market price of the victim’s possession stored in the 2nd floor production team office; and (e) 140 won in total at the two cars waiting before the factory.

B. On June 5, 2016, around June 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the factory under the above paragraph (a) around 20:00 on June 5, 2016; (b) removed the door door of a factory without locking; (c) dismantled up the door door of a 2nd floor fixtures by using the drack; (d) removed and intruded the door door of a drack; and (e) embling the two-story fixtures door, citing 89 in total at the market price of the victim’s ownership.

(c)

On July 23, 2016, the Defendant, who attempted to intrude on a structure and larceny, was in a factory under the above paragraph (a) around July 19:50 on July 23, 2016, and went into the factory, and went into the factory through a rear window, and attempted to steal the dunes owned by the victim. However, it is difficult to say that the occurrence of the crime would be avoided when the victim discovered CCTV installed newly, and the Defendant attempted to escape out of the factory.

2. Defendant B is a deceased noble business operator.

A. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant received a request from A to purchase KRW 4247,00,00 in total amount of the market price that was stolen from a factory of the victim (state) C at the time of Ansan-si, A around 08:00 on May 29, 2016, the Defendant received a request from A to purchase KRW 140,00,000 in the aggregate of the market price that was stolen from a factory of the victim (state) C.

engages in the business of purchasing scrap goods.

arrow