A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Central District Court on March 24, 2017, a summary order of five million won for the same crime at the Seoul East East District Court on March 24, 2017, and on September 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the same court on September 23, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 23, 2017.

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was punished twice or more for violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (D-learning driving) as seen above, the Defendant driven the automobile under the influence of alcohol level of 0.070% at around 06:30 on April 15, 2018, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the traffic of the road and the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a DNA-learning car.

At the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) reported the police officer who installed a window intending to shoulder the Defendant while divingd in three-lanes near Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (b) operated his own car to avoid this; and (c) took part of the back part of the police box F of the police box for the Defendant’s vehicle stopped on the front side of the vehicle at the time of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the Seoul National Police Agency Gangwon-gu Police Station E-gu, Seoul National Police Station for Police Station, which was stopping on the front side of the vehicle at the time of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) destroyed the repair cost of KRW 307,678 by leaving the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the damage, the Defendant did not immediately stop

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A survey report on the actual situation of an accident, a statement on the circumstances of the driver in charge of the primary accident, a report on detection of the driver in charge of the primary accident, and

1. 112 A list of reported handling;

1. Photographss of damaged vehicles, booms images, panping photographs, and estimates;

1. Previouss before ruling: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history;