logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고정607
전파법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to manufacture, sell, or import broadcasting and communications equipment, or machinery and materials which obstruct electromagnetic waves or are affected by electromagnetic waves (hereinafter referred to as "broadcasting and communications equipment, etc.") shall obtain certification of conformity and registration of conformity or provisional certification in accordance with the standards for suitability evaluation of the relevant equipment.

Nevertheless, in July 2016, the Defendant engaged in the CCTV manufacturing business with the trade name “C” from the underground floor located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, and manufactured 8 Seocho-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and sold 23,000 won per 184,000 won per unit to the enterprise “E” located in 12, Dong-gu, Seoul, and 13, and 14.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made to the defendant during the police interrogation protocol (one time);

1. A report on the results of each smartphone evidence submission program;

1. Copy of the records (report on investigation, F, and protocol of interrogation of G suspect);

1. Answer to a request for cooperation in investigation or for cooperation in investigation;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the report of internal investigation (as to the verification of the U.S. evidence), investigation report (as to the derivatives model HD-D24 U.S. modeled model HD-D24, investigation report (as to each suspect F), investigation report (as to the early seizure of each suspect F), investigation report (as to attachment of the early small and medium camera photograph kept by each G company), investigation report (as to the number of early small and medium cameras sold by the victim), investigation report (as to the number of early small and medium cameras sold by the victim) [the defendant and his defense counsel, the defendant and his defense counsel are manufactured with special orders as part for the production of the cash payment machine, and they are subject to exemption from conformity assessment under Article 58-3 (1) 3 of the Radio Waves Act.

According to some statements made by G, G purchased the instant camera from G, G, and the Defendant’s investigative agency, G purchased the instant camera from the Defendant, and G purchased the instant camera order from F to the Defendant.

arrow