A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) even though the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics

A. A. A.m., psychotropic drugs obtained on February 1, 2015 as an unexploited situation at around 08:00, in a manner in which the Metepia (hereinafter referred to as a “popon”; hereinafter referred to as a “popon”) volume is kept in the receipt book of the Defendant’s office located in Busan Sauri-gu C;

B. Around 03:00 on February 2, 2015, at the home of the above Defendant, the philophone scopon was injected in a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and then injection into the spopon spopher spopher spopher.

2. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00, at the end of the bus terminal located in Busan Yancheon-ro 43, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of his/her duties by assaulting, plucking, plucking, etc. F, of F’s hand, with his/her hand, the Defendant intending to keep E and F’s gun at his/her seat and deducted him/her from his/her seat on the 17th bus terminal located in Busan Yancheon-ro 43, Busan Yancheon-ro; and (c) he/she obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of his/her duties concerning the maintenance of public order by assaulting, plucking, etc. of F’s hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The statement concerning F;

1. Two copies of photographic materials of damage;

1. Requests for each appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1), and 2 subparag. 3 (b), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of imprisonment, and Article 136 (1) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., even though the defendant had the record of four times or more of the crime of the same philopon, again, led to the crime of the instant case, and the defendant has failed after the philopon medication.