Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 23:40 on May 21, 2018, around 23:40, and around 112 reported by the Defendant’s wife, and (b) the police officers and patrolmen assigned to the E box called out after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report, enter the report against the said D in order to identify the details of the report; and (c) the Defendant stated that the Defendant “I am separately friended from the friesta and D.

Whereever a police officer boomed a knish kids kids, “F and G chests are tightly tightly tightly, f and G’s chests were tightly pushed down with G, as it threatens to see by drinking a house that led to G, and assaulted the chest of a slope H who continued to be called together.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV image closure;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the crime of this case was committed again during the period of suspension of the execution of the crime of this kind for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is committed again during the period of suspension of the execution of the crime of this case, is against the defendant, the defendant is against the defendant, the defendant's attitude of the crime of this case is not much much weighted, and the defendant seems to need medical treatment and edification within society than the treatment inside the facility, and the defendant's family members have more active medical treatment and rehabilitation against the defendant, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the order,