A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates the facility management business (main)C in the second floor of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building.

While the Defendant prepared for a bid related to the selection of D apartment security service companies in the Gyeonggisan City, the time limit for issuing a document necessary for the tender is imminent, the Defendant was willing to forge and submit a written notice of information disclosure under the name of the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station.

On February 8, 2013, the Defendant had E director participate in the tender of security service providers in the document form form using the computer document preparation function at the above company office around February 8, 2013, and the ( state)C seeking to participate in the tender of security service providers in the content column does not have any administrative disposition at present.

“A document is forged by writing the purport, writing, printing out other necessary phrases, and attaching the seal under the name of the head of Seoul Yangcheon Police Station on April 17, 2012, which was duly formed on the information disclosure notice, and then in a way that can be cut off by a re-sampner.

As a result, the Defendant forged a written decision on the request for information disclosure under the name of the head of Seoul Yangcheon Police Station, which is an official document concerning a certificate of fact without authority for the purpose of exercising the authority, and on the same day, at the office of the apartment management office of the above apartment, submitted the document as if it was an official document which was actually prepared.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each decision to disclose information;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the list of approvals under the Onnuri system attached to an investigation report (data submitted by an accuser);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the following circumstances") of the suspended sentence (the decision of a sentence) is a non-business and non-organizational basis, such as forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents.