A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, at around 03:50 on June 15, 2013, leave from the Fju place operated by the defendant's friendly job offers E, which is located in Pyeongtaek-si D.

In order to listen to the circumstances of the case by the head of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station G District, which was called up after receiving a report of 112 that he did not respond to the Gu, he saw that the head of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station G District H would want to listen to the situation of the case, and the head of the Dong-gu Police Station, “this farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb far farb far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing selective punishment for a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor is a crime that obstructs the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officers dispatched after receiving a report by the defendant. In addition, the defendant has been punished by various acts of violence, etc. on December 17, 2012, and the probationary defendant is currently under suspension of execution after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution on December 25, 2012 by the Suwon District Court for the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.

In light of the fact that the above crime was committed without being aware of during the period, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case with the attitude of disregarding the legitimate exercise of public authority, it is inevitable to sentence sentence.