All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to each punishment (two million won each fine) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the instant crime, including the following facts: (a) the amount of light oil that Defendant A had leaked to the neighboring sea reaches about 18 liters; and (b) the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions for the Defendants compared to the original judgment; and (c) the details and means of the instant crime; and (d) each sentence imposed by the lower court to the Defendants is deemed unfair; and (e) the Defendants’ above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 127 subparag. 2 and Article 22(1) of the Marine Environment Management Act (amended by Act No. 14516, Dec. 27, 2016); Article 127 subparag. 2 and Article 22 subparag. 2 of the former Marine Environment Management Act (amended by Act No. 14516, Dec. 27, 2016); Article 130 subparag. 2 of the same Act and Article 127 subparag. 2 of the former Marine Environment Management Act (amended by Act No. 14516, Dec. 27, 2016); Article 130 subparag. 2 of the former Marine Environment Management Act (amended by Act No. 14516, Dec. 27, 201).