Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the friendship of the victim C (73 years of age, women).

On October 15, 2016, at around 00:30, the Defendant stated the victim’s market price in his/her dwelling room in his/her dwelling room for the reason that the victim’s disregarded himself/herself of his/her reputation in his/her dwelling room in his/her dwelling room in his/her class of Gangwon-do, as “market price of between 120 and 1.3 million won,” but the Defendant’s indictment is corrected to “market price of KRW 1.2 million, which is the lowest amount so as not to disadvantage the Defendant’s exercise of his/her defense to clearly specify the market price.”

The market price is 2.6 million won, such as one Samsung coolant, 1 unit of 600,000 won in the market price (300,000 won per unit), 1 unit of 200,000 won in the market price, and 2 unit of 600,000 won in the market price (300,000 won per unit), and 1 unit of cood, and 2.6 million won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C Police Statement Statement;

1. The occurrence of damage to property, arrest report, family relation certificate, application of statutes governing field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was punished for several violent crimes, and in particular, even if the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 22, 2012 by imprisonment with prison labor at the Chuncheon District Court on May 22, 2012, the defendant committed the crime of destroying the property of this case against the victim again even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 2, 2012, the defendant committed the crime of destroying the property of this case against the victim again, the crime is bad in light of the circumstances of the crime of this case, the degree of damage, and the defendant's family members, including the victim, suffered serious pain for a long time.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is dissatising and reflecting the fact that the defendant is suffering from the satisfic disease, and that it seems that medical treatment is necessary, while the trial is in progress, the victim wishes to be punished by the defendant.