Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a business establishment similar to D with the trade name “D” from Asan-si C2.

From May 26, 2013 to October 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) provided eight smuggling in which a bed 40 square meters was installed; (b) hired E, F, etc. as a female, received KRW 80,00 in return for sexual traffic from an unspecified male guest who found the said place; and (c) provided guidance to the smuggling waiting for the female sexual traffic, leading the female sexual traffic to the situation that the female sexual traffic may stimulates the sexual desire of the male guest by hand; and (d) arranged sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Entry of an investigation report (Attachment of a credit card sales slip);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes entered in a business registration certificate, lease contract;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the number of business days 515 】 40,000 won (80,000 won ± 2) ± the average number of losses per day = 41,20,000 won];

1. The Defendant’s argument regarding the Defendant’s claim under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is disputing the number of business days by asserting that he/she did not operate his/her business on the Sundays or a monthly day of every week. However, the Defendant’s defense counsel confirmed that he/she commenced sexual traffic business (in the face of 82 of the Investigation Records), which the Defendant acknowledged that he/she commenced sexual traffic business (in the face of 82 of the Investigation Records), is Sundays on October 13, 2014, which he/she stated (in the face of 16 pages of the Investigation Records) that he/she began to engage in sexual traffic, and there are many details settled on the Sundays and a monthly day according to the credit card sales slip, and the Defendant’s defense counsel confirmed the payment details and did not run his/her business on Sundays.