Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that, with respect to the punishment (two years of suspended execution in the month of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and eight hours of social service) of the judgment of the court below, the prosecutor is too unfurned and the prosecutor is too unfurned and thus unfair.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant is making a confession of a crime and is against the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant has no criminal record exceeding the fine is a favorable reason for sentencing; (c) the State’s legal order and order are established and eradicates the light of public authority; and (d) there is a need for strict punishment of interference with the performance of official duties; and (e) the Defendant’s criminal

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading up to the commission of the offense, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the judgment of the court below is deemed reasonable, and the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.