All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the punishment of the lower judgment (a fine of KRW 1.5 million against the Defendants) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. In order to establish a judgment, to establish the state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, the fact that there is a need to strictly punish a crime of interference with the performance of official duties is an unfavorable reason for sentencing. The fact that the Defendants are committed in the confession of the crime, and the Defendants B are the first offender, and there is no criminal conviction exceeding the same criminal record or fine even for the other Defendants, and the degree of violation of the law on obstruction of the performance of official duties or assembly and demonstration is the favorable reason for sentencing.

The Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, since the judgment of the court below is reasonable, in full view of the above sentencing factors, including the Defendants’ age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.