The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around August 7, 2016, around 08:40 on August 7, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant filed a divorce lawsuit by referring to the victim D who was employed by the E Government as a member of the Korean Government as a member of the Korean Government, using a mobile phone of the Defendant 414 of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice Board for 1.6 billion won for purchase recommendation on the Nombl.

“.......”

However, in fact, the victims were not members of the No. 500, and they did not have any relationship with the No. 500, and they did not have a divorce lawsuit with the wife.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. A crime of non-prosecution for judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution of non-prosecution for the victim on January 10, 2017, which was after a public prosecution was instituted pursuant to Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)