logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.08 2016가단56135
토지인도
Text

1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff F:

A. Of the 60,319 square meters in Seocho-gu Seoul J, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) also has an appraisal of the attached Form.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As to the area of 60,319 square meters in Seocho-gu Seoul J (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the share of 20370 percent in the aggregate on February 6, 2004 and December 3, 2010 was completed in the name of the Plaintiff A, respectively, and the share of 101860 percent in the name of the Plaintiff B, C, D, and April 28, 2010, respectively, for the share of 101860 percent in the name of the Plaintiff B, C, D, and 18340 percent in the name of the Plaintiff B, C, and 18340 percent in the name of the Plaintiff on February 6, 2004.

B. The Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against K, etc. for partition of co-owned property (No. 201Gadan452653), and on November 5, 2014, the protocol was prepared to divide the instant real property into the joint ownership of the Plaintiffs in the proportion of each share of 6/1 shares by Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E, respectively, among the instant real property.

C. As to the instant real estate, B.

Although a protocol of mediation as described in paragraph (1) was prepared, the Plaintiffs were not able to complete the registration consistent with the legal relationship of the above protocol of mediation.

① On the other hand, Defendant F’s appraisal of the instant real estate is also against the Plaintiffs.

It is the part received as a partition of co-owned property according to the protocol of mediation.

40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 53, 48, 54, 554, 555, 556, 556, 556, 56, 56, 56, 56, 56, 56, 60, 61, 62, 14, 27, 278, 186, 278, 278, and 14, etc.

arrow