logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.10.24 2014고단969
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The amount of KRW 135,00 shall be 130,000,000, and the compensation shall be the applicant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2014 Highest969】

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dowing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) are those who are engaged in driving of JNF cars.

On June 2, 2014, at around 02:30 on June 2, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver’s license, and moved to a right-hand from the public library to the central market.

At this point, there is no distinction between the sidewalk and the roadway, and since there is a place where pedestrians are frequent, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of the course by examining the direction of the passage and the right and the right and the right before the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to bypass it, and received the part of the Victim M (21) who was a pedestrian, who was a pedestrian living together, from the top side of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer injury to the right shoulder, etc., which requires treatment for about two weeks, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, and escaped as it is.

2. In the time and place set forth in Paragraph 1, the injured Defendant: (a) committed a scambling test that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the injured party on the ground that the injured party N(n, 20 years of age) who was disputing M due to the said traffic accident was scambling the injured party N(n, 20 years of age).

[Judgment of the court below]

3. On February 18, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant’s house located in Yong-gun, Yong-Gun, that “The Victim O made a phone call from the victim to send galloned gallon at the victim’s house by making a phone call of KRW 50,000 to the victim.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, gallonies.

arrow