logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.05.15 2013고단634
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 11, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 1.5 million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and a summary order of 2.5 million won by a fine at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 24, 2011, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car B.

On March 2, 2013, the Defendant driving the said car under the influence of alcohol with 0.193% of blood alcohol concentration around 08:31 on March 2, 2013, and driving the Olympic Games located in 387, Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes between the 4-lane between the 1st parallel and the 1st parallel.

The course has been changed to three lanes.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to operate direction direction when changing the vehicle line and give prior notice of change of course and to change the vehicle line in the future and the future.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and instead received the back portion of the D-shacker's left side of the car driving by the injured party C(the age of 48) who was driving three lanes due to the change of the vehicle line to the right side of the D-shacker's car.

The Defendant continued to drive the said car and continued to turn it to the direction of sacratics from the parallel of the Olympic Winter Games, which was located in the said 390-24.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has the duty of care to take part in driving duty after checking the right and the right of the roadside prior to the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the way.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the F Sti-type car driving by the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 46 years old) who was driving on the right side from the right side due to the negligence of bypassing it.

The Defendant is guilty of occupational negligence as above.

arrow