1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as set forth in paragraph (2) above; and (b) the Defendant’s additional assertion is as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment as set forth in paragraph (3) below; and (c) therefore, (d) it

2. On the 7th 4th m 7th m m m 8th m m 8th m m 8th m m 8th m m 8st m m 8 to "in confinement", "22 to 27, and 35th m m 25th m m 8th m m 8th m m 8th m 8th m m 8 "the fact that the upper m 105m m 105 has not been paid up to the present m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 91st m m m m m m m 9 "the m m m m m 105th m m m m 106th m m m m m m m 10 "

3. Judgment on the defendant's additional assertion

A. On September 12, 2014, the instant contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with respect to the instant commercial building on September 12, 2014, constitutes a contract agreement under the Civil Act. Since the sales contract other than the instant commercial building 101 and 102 was made through a licensed real estate agent, the Plaintiff who did not provide services is not entitled to claim a sales agency fee. Even if the Plaintiff had the right to claim a sales agency fee, the Plaintiff is not entitled to claim a compensation for damages in lieu of defect repair under Article 667(2) of the Civil Act.