1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the Enforcement Rule of the Decree on Punishment of Public Officials in Part 4 of Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance (amended by Ordinance of the Prime Minister No. 1467, May 30, 2018; hereinafter the same shall apply) shall be amended to "Enforcement Rule of the Decree on Punishment of Public Officials" (amended by Ordinance of the Prime Minister No. 1467, May 30, 201; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (b) each "G" in Part 12, 13, and 11, 2, and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended to "C" in addition to the use of each "G" in Part 8, 13,

(1) In light of the above legal principles, the court below's determination that the ground for appeal by the plaintiff is not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and all evidence submitted by the first instance court is examined, and the first instance court's determination that the ground for appeal in this case is recognized and there is no error of law that deviates from or abused discretionary power, and that the plaintiff's claim seeking the revocation of the disposition in this case is rejected. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the first instance court's appeal is just and therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition.