logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.04.04 2017고단447
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane XG car.

1. On September 14, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.108% in alcohol while driving the said vehicle while under the influence of around 19:5 on September 14, 2016 without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury), violation of Road Traffic Act, violation of Road Traffic Act (dact-free Driving), and violation of Road Traffic Act (dact-free Driving). The Defendant was driving the said motor vehicle at a level of 0.108% in alcohol level in the blood, and led three-lanes of three-lane roads in front of the office of the Yancheon-gu, Yan

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking well the left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in the same direction as the Defendant’s passenger car, while driving in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s passenger car at the time when the Defendant was negligent, and the victim C (23 tax) who was in the atmosphere of the signal was faced with the Defendant’s driver part of the front part of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused damage to repair costs, such as 3,791,984 won, such as the exchange of pan-furged vehicles owned by the victim due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (22 years) who was on board the said A-furged vehicle with approximately two weeks of care, such as curgical salt, tension, etc., and suffered injury to the victim E (22 years of age) who was on board the said A-furged vehicle.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the above date, time, and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A traffic accident report, a survey report, and an accident scene photograph;

1. To inquire into the circumstances of the driver involved in driving and the results of the crackdown on drinking;

arrow