logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고단4370
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant C is not a handler of narcotics.

A. On January 22, 2017, at around 04:00, the Defendant administered a medication in a manner that inhales the Kenya’s non-commercial volume, which is a native mental medicine D possessed in the G of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. The Defendant 1 administered, at the time, at the time, at the place, and at the place of the above paragraph A, in a manner that helps people see the fact that MDMA (one X-si, hereinafter referred to as “EX-si”) 1, which is a local mental medicine, was administered together with water.

2. Defendant D is not a handler of narcotics.

A. At the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1 above, the Defendant administered the Kenya’s sterine in a manner that inhales the breath’s flusium, which is one of the native mental drugs he had.

B. At the same time, at the same place, the Defendant: (a) administered X-gu 1, an X-gu 1, a drug with each native mental medicine, in a way that the X-gu 1, while continuing to administer the X-gu 1, in a way that the X-gu 1, as well as the water.

3. Defendant A is not a handler of narcotics.

A. The Defendant 1 administered the above 1 at the time, place, and in such a manner as to inhale the breath’s inscoculic dose, which is a local mental medicine.

B. The Defendant administered the drug at the same time, at the same place, in a manner that enables 1 X-si, which is a local mental medicine, to take the drug together with water.

4. Defendant E is not a handler of narcotics.

Defendant from around May 5, 2017

5.7. At the end of the border, typology and X-how were administered, respectively, in a non-fluoral manner, in a fluoral and fluoral form, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. A written appraisal of each drug;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the calculation of an additional collection charge);

1. Relevant Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of Narcotics, Etc. for Criminal Facts (or the choice of each imprisonment with prison labor), and Article 60 (1) 3 (b) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution;

arrow