logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단5106
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Western District Court, and on June 2, 2017, a summary order of KRW 4,00,000 as a fine for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court.

1. On October 27, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Dless driving) on and around October 27, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle CK5 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 0.071% of alcohol concentration in the blood alcohol level at about 10km from the vicinity of the shooting distance to the entrance of the main road of the apartment unit 17-F apartment from Nowon-gu to the island of Nowon-gu.

2. Around the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant signed the “F” at the driver’s signature column of the statement report on the driver’s circumstantial statement at the entrance of the 17th-day apartment apartment building, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the entrance of the main road of the Dong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant demanded the driver to disclose his personal information by drinking from the slope E belonging to the Seoul Nowon Police Station D, and the Defendant’s relative F (G).

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, submitted a written statement on the circumstances of the driver at the same State, as if the signature of the forged F was genuine, to a slope E who may know of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the forged signature of others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, a statement on the circumstances of the driver under driving, the ledger of driver's licenses, and a report on detection of the driver under driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, summary order, and other Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 subparag. 1, Article 44 subparag. 1 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol), Article 152 subparag. 1, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license), Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of driving without a license) concerning criminal facts, and Article 239 of the Criminal Act.

arrow