As to the first crime in the judgment of the defendant, two months of imprisonment, and the first-B, C and 2 of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised ex officio to the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense.

[criminal power] On February 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and completed the execution of the sentence on April 20, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant and the victim B (n, 54 years old) were married couple, and the defendant lived with the victim in the Nam-gu Seoul Building D, Nam-gu, Gwangju and drinking alcohol at any time.

1. Special intimidation;

가. 피고인은 2017. 2. 11. 새벽경 전남 화순군 E에 있는 피고인 모친의 주거지 안방에서 피해자가 시댁에 늦게 왔다는 이유로 화가 나서 주먹과 발로 피해자를 수회 때리고, 계속하여 집 안에 있는 위험한 물건인 부엌칼을 가지고 와 피해자의 목에 가까이 대고 “죽여버린다.”라고 위협하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

B. On July 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00, on the grounds that the Defendant and the victim’s residence were not properly provided with the Defendant’s mother’s sick care; (b) made the victim several times due to drinking and booming; and (c) made the kitchen gate, which is a dangerous object in the house continuously located, with a kitchen knick, which is close to the part of the Defendant and the victim, and threatened the victim “I am am her bry and her shed with her bry, and her she was dead.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

C. At around 17:00 at the end of July 2020, the Defendant stated in the indictment that the Defendant and the victim’s above residence indicate that the Defendant does not have the right to know the Defendant, and that the Defendant does not have the right to know the Defendant, the Defendant’s bill of indictment is “meme,” but it appears to be an error (see, e.g., e., 32 pages, 213 of the investigation record) and ex officio.